PDA

View Full Version : Men claim sexual encounters with Sen. Craig


Crystalline
12-03-2007, 10:57 AM
http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d118/Ditzyowlme/1298512304_16e3ac5381.jpg
(12/03/07 - BOISE, ID) -- Eight men say they either had sex with Sen. Larry Craig or were targets of sexual advances by the Idaho lawmaker at various times during his political career, a newspaper reported Sunday.
One of the men is the former escort whose allegations disgraced the Rev. Ted Haggard, former president of the National Association of Evangelicals, the Idaho Statesman reported.
The newspaper identified four men and reported details of the encounters they say involved Craig. It also reported the accounts of four other men who did not agree to be identified but who described sexual advances or encounters involving the conservative Republican, who opposes same-sex marriage and has a strong record against gay rights.
Craig pleaded guilty to disorderly conduct after being accused by an undercover officer of soliciting sex at the Minneapolis-St. Paul airport and later called a news conference to deny that he is gay.
The newspaper acknowledged that its report was not based on definitive evidence but said it also found no evidence to disprove the accounts of the four identified men. It said it reviewed the senator's travel records, which put him where the sex is alleged to have taken place, and did background checks on those making the allegations.
Craig and members of his staff declined to comment to the newspaper.
But in a statement e-mailed to The Associated Press on Sunday, the senator said the newspaper's report was "completely false" and he accused the paper of careless journalism.
"It is unfortunate that the Idaho Statesman has chosen to continue to lower itself to the standards of what can best be described as tabloid journalism," Craig said in the statement.
"Despite the fact the Idaho Statesman has decided to pursue its own agenda and print these falsehoods without any facts to back them up, I won't let this paper's attempt to malign my name stop me from continuing my work to serve the people of Idaho."
The report is the Statesman's latest on allegations about Craig's sexual background since his June arrest in an airport men's room sex sting operation was reported in late August.
Statesman Editor Vicki Gowler said the newspaper spent several months checking the backgrounds and details of the men's stories.
"We believe it's important for you to know what we've learned and to hear the men's own words," Gowler said.
Two of the identified men and one of the unidentified men told the newspaper they had sex with Craig.
One of the men identified in the report, Mike Jones, 50, described as a former male escort, was the focus of the sex scandal involving Haggard, the disgraced leader of Colorado's New Life Church.
Jones said Craig paid him $200 for sex in late 2004 or early 2005. The encounter took place at a studio apartment in downtown Denver, Jones said.
Jones told the Statesman that he did not recognize Craig until his arrest made the news. The newspaper reported that Jones went on the record after Craig appeared in a television news report in August to address the arrest and his future in politics.
Jones has written a book about his experience with Haggard and acknowledged to the Statesman that his allegation about Craig might help sales. A message left for Jones by The Associated Press through his publisher Sunday evening was not immediately returned.
Current phone numbers could not be found for the three other men identified in the Statesman's report.
Amid pressure from top GOP leaders in Washington, Craig announced his intent to resign from the Senate. He later changed his mind, deciding to finish out his term, which expires in January 2009. He is also appealing in Minnesota courts to have his guilty plea overturned.
The undercover police officer who arrested Craig said the senator moved his foot next to the officer's foot and tapped it in a way that indicated he wanted sex. He also alleged the senator sent a signal by swiping his hand under the divider between men's room stalls.
Craig has said the officer misconstrued those motions.
(Copyright ©2007 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.)
http://abclocal.go.com/ktrk/story?section=news/national_world&id=5809971

txgsxrbob
12-03-2007, 11:01 AM
This guy just needs to come out of the closet !!! or bathroom stall !!!:supergay::supergay::supergay::leghump::leghump ::leghump::leghump::butt::butt::butt::butt:

Crystalline
12-03-2007, 11:02 AM
The undercover police officer who arrested Craig said the senator moved his foot next to the officer's foot and tapped it in a way that indicated he wanted sex. He also alleged the senator sent a signal by swiping his hand under the divider between men's room stalls.


Baahaahahahaha!!!

Cherub
12-03-2007, 12:29 PM
thats just fuggin nasty

SPYDER BITE
12-03-2007, 12:32 PM
Silly ***gits dicks are for chicks:rofl::rofl:

Sifu-TZ
12-03-2007, 12:37 PM
Bathroom stalls are really romantic.

txgsxrbob
12-03-2007, 12:39 PM
Humpty got busy in a burger king bathroom !!

AliceInChains02
12-03-2007, 12:42 PM
Silly ***gits dicks are for chicks:rofl::rofl:


unless you're sucking your own dick?

maskale
12-03-2007, 12:46 PM
I tap my foot sometimes if the bottom of my foot itches, I will have to remember not to do that.

txgsxrbob
12-03-2007, 12:49 PM
I tap my foot sometimes if the bottom of my foot itches, I will have to remember not to do that.

it was ok to do that b-4 he got caught !! So now you'll have to make your own gay signal !! j/j :rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:

AliceInChains02
12-03-2007, 12:49 PM
I tap my foot sometimes if the bottom of my foot itches, I will have to remember not to do that.

also, remember not to reach under other peoples stalls after establishing eye contact with them through the crack in the door of their stall and playing footsy with them.

SPYDER BITE
12-03-2007, 12:55 PM
unless you're sucking your own dick?

that is a feat i would like to see





















sorta:keke:

AliceInChains02
12-03-2007, 01:06 PM
that is a feat i would like to see





















sorta:keke:

check your avatar:keke:

Crystalline
12-03-2007, 01:26 PM
check your avatar:keke:

:keke::keke:

txgsxrbob
12-03-2007, 01:33 PM
+1

ArturoC
12-03-2007, 08:03 PM
Like they say, it's not the crime that gets you in trouble, it's the cover up.

:rofl:

bumblebee
12-03-2007, 09:10 PM
The newspaper acknowledged that its report was not based on definitive evidence but said it also found no evidence to disprove the accounts of the four identified men.

That's really scary that a newspaper can publish the claims of these men without evidence.
It used to be that a reputible news outlet would never knowingly report a story with out corroberating facts and cross checking their sources. Now apperently all it takes is someone to say some crap and a publisher with an agenda and the story goes to print... damn the facts!

bumblebee
12-03-2007, 09:12 PM
Silly ***gits dicks are for chicks:rofl::rofl:



I think it's interesting that the forum censors the word "*** got" for you, but feels it is OK to spell out "dick".
Very politically correct , sorta.:keke:

bumblebee
12-03-2007, 09:14 PM
Can I spell out ***? I guess not, hmm.


How queer?
Well, that's interesting. We can say silly queers dicks are for chicks! YAY!

ArturoC
12-03-2007, 09:15 PM
That's really scary that a newspaper can publish the claims of these men without evidence.
It used to be that a reputible news outlet would never knowingly report a story with out corroberating facts and cross checking their sources. Now apperently all it takes is someone to say some crap and a publisher with an agenda and the story goes to print... damn the facts!


Definitely sad. There's no difference between 'real' news outlets and tabloids anymore. All out to make a buck.


"never let the facts get in the way of a good story"

AliceInChains02
12-03-2007, 09:37 PM
That's really scary that a newspaper can publish the claims of these men without evidence.
It used to be that a reputible news outlet would never knowingly report a story with out corroberating facts and cross checking their sources. Now apperently all it takes is someone to say some crap and a publisher with an agenda and the story goes to print... damn the facts!

"It said it reviewed the senator's travel records, which put him where the sex is alleged to have taken place, and did background checks on those making the allegations."

Might not be solid proof, but I'd say that's substantial.

bumblebee
12-03-2007, 10:21 PM
[One of the men identified in the report, Mike Jones, 50, described as a former male escort, was the focus of the sex scandal involving Haggard, the disgraced leader of Colorado's New Life Church. ...

Jones has written a book about his experience with Haggard and acknowledged to the Statesman that his allegation about Craig might help sales.

Current phone numbers could not be found for the three other men identified in the Statesman's report.
[/FONT]




Don't get me wrong I'm not defending Sen. Craig but it's disgraceful that a newspaper would print the claims of these men without more proof. One guy admits he is hoping that by saying this, his book about a different sex scandal will sell better. The others can't be contacted at all.
It just doesn't seem right that they can help destroy this guys career just by printing claims with so little proof. Many people read this kinda stuff and accept it without thinking. Then the person at the center, is tried in the court of public opinion and he is selling orthopedic shoes the next week.

AliceInChains02
12-03-2007, 10:28 PM
if the gay-animosity that he perpetuated helps destroy him, regardless of his guilt, i'd say that's justice.

Jay
12-04-2007, 06:58 AM
that guy is fabulousy perverted........................lol

ArturoC
12-04-2007, 11:56 AM
if the gay-animosity that he perpetuated helps destroy him, regardless of his guilt, i'd say that's justice.



Seems like the more 'anti-gay' they are, the more they are proven to actually be gay. :rofl:

I couldn't care less.


He pleaded guilty to the crime, not to be gay, but I guess that just goes with the territory. lol

cashtown
12-04-2007, 12:09 PM
Not to stick up for the guy, but if tapping your foot and waving your hand under a bathroom stall is worth a trip to jail then that sounds like a town I want to live in - because the police there obviously don't have any worse crime to prevent!!

Sifu-TZ
12-04-2007, 01:34 PM
Uh, sorry to be the guy that breaks out the Man Rule Handbook, but;

You shall keep your eyes to yourself while at the urinal.
Kicking stall doors open is acceptable.
Flush, jackass. No one cares what you ate or how big it was.
Unless the guy in the next stall is a close friend, no talking. I may be battling it out in there, so I need concetration not distraction.
Keep your f$ckin hand, foot, face, dick or your side of the stall.
Peep though the stall once, ok. Next time you will be looking down a barrel.
If you wanna have sex with another willing guy that's your business just go find a closet or car trunk. We're trying to get past the taco-shits in here and that's not making anyone's day better.
I'd prefer to just be in here alone anyway.
If I start laughing uncontrollably, it's cuz I just named one of the poops mohamed and it's oddly hilarious to me.
Everyone just shut the hell up, you bunch of carnies.

So say we all.

Mr. Unassailable
12-04-2007, 01:36 PM
i fukd him too. :D

ArturoC
12-04-2007, 01:38 PM
Uh, sorry to be the guy that breaks out the Man Rule Handbook, but;

You shall keep your eyes to yourself while at the urinal.
Kicking stall doors open is acceptable.
Flush, jackass. No one cares what you ate or how big it was.
Unless the guy in the next stall is a close friend, no talking. I may be battling it out in there, so I need concetration not distraction.
Keep your f$ckin hand, foot, face, dick or your side of the stall.
Peep though the stall once, ok. Next time you will be looking down a barrel.
If you wanna have sex with another willing guy that's your business just go find a closet or car trunk. We're trying to get past the taco-shits in here and that's not making anyone's day better.
I'd prefer to just be in here alone anyway.
If I start laughing uncontrollably, it's cuz I just named one of the poops mohamed and it's oddly hilarious to me.
Everyone just shut the hell up, you bunch of carnies.

So say we all.



So say we all.

cashtown
12-04-2007, 01:38 PM
i fukd him too. :D

you fukker

Mr. Unassailable
12-04-2007, 01:40 PM
you fukker

it was good. and he paid me in $2 bills :keke: